Awat La

ABSOLUTE WITH A TWIST

More About Me...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, nisl elit viverra sollicitudin phasellus eros, vitae a mollis. Congue sociis amet, fermentum lacinia sed, orci auctor in vitae amet enim. Ridiculus nullam proin vehicula nulla euismod id. Ac est facilisis eget, ligula lacinia, vitae sed lorem nunc. Orci at nulla risus ullamcorper arcu. Nunc integer ornare massa diam sollicitudin.

Another Tit-Bit...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, nisl elit viverra sollicitudin phasellus eros, vitae a mollis. Congue sociis amet, fermentum lacinia sed, orci auctor in vitae amet enim. Ridiculus nullam proin vehicula nulla euismod id. Ac est facilisis eget, ligula lacinia, vitae sed lorem nunc.

Showing posts with label Nizar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nizar. Show all posts

Politik Perak: 22 hours later

Nizar In Zambry Out

This was published in Malaysian Insider yesterday;

For at least 19 hours, Datuk Seri Nizar Jamaluddin is the legitimate Mentri Besar of Perak.

High Court judge Datuk Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim today ruled that that the only way to force the MB to resign is through a vote of no-confidence in the state assembly.

He rejected a plea for a stay of execution from lawyers for Datuk Zambry Abdul Kadir, the Barisan Nasional politician who was installed as the chief executive of the state by the Sultan of Perak, Sultan Azlan Shah.

Zambry’s lawyers are expected to make a beeline for the Court of Appeal tomorrow morning to obtain a stay of execution of the High Court ruling – a ruling which has added another chapter to the story of the power grab which began with the defection of three Pakatan Rakyat lawmakers in February.

But till then, Nizar is the MB of Perak.

Tommy Thomas, an expert in constitutional law, told The Malaysian Insider: “Upon the pen being put down by the judge and by the fact there was no stay of execution, Nizar is the MB of Perak.’’


Read More...

This is today:

Nizar out as MB again!

Approximately 22 hours after the Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled that he was the rightful mentri besar of Perak, Datuk Seri Nizar Jamaluddin is now unable to act as mentri besar again after the Court of Appeal granted an unconditional stay of yesterday's High Court order.

Judge Datuk Ramly Haji Ali said that he was satisfied that there were special circumstances and granted the stay order to Datuk Seri Zambry Abdul Kadir at about 1.15 pm.

The effect of the stay order is that Nizar cannot act as mentri besar pending the appeal of yesterday's High Court decision by Zambry.

The date of appeal was not determined but Ramly said that he will set an early appeal date.

Datuk Cecil Abraham, the lead counsel for Zambry said that since Nizar, was seeking to use his position as mentri besar to seek a dissolution of the state assembly, it would render the actual appeal by Zambry unnecessary and thus a stay of yesterday's order was required.

Sulaiman Abdullah, the lead counsel for Nizar argued however, that the decision to dissolve the state assembly was the perrogative of the Sultan of Perak and that there was no guarantee that the Sultan would agree to a dissolution pending Zambry's appeal.

Nizar's lawyers are now exploring the possibility of setting aside the stay order but will seek instructions from their client first.

Mohd Hafarizam Harun who was holding a watching brief for Barisan Nasional told reporters that Nizar should now do what Zambry had done and respect the court's decision and vacate the office of mentri besar honorably.


PERAK - Nizar dan Exco Pakatan Keluar Bangunan SUK

Nizar dan Exco Pakatan meninggalkan Bangunan Pejabat SUK Perak setelah mehkamah memperkenankan permohonan Zambry untuk menangguhkan perintah Mahkamah Tinggi semalam. Permohonan Zambry diperkenankan untuk sepanjang tempoh rayuannya berhubung keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi semalam yang mengesahkan Nizar masih sah MB Perak.
More...
Kebiasannya Nizar dan Exco Pakatan akan berhimpun dan mengadakan sidang akhbar di Bangunan DAP negri Perak namun kali ini danya akan diadakan di Bangunan PAS Perak. Tindakan ini dilihat sebagai persediaan awal Nizar dan DAP untuk menafikan dakwaan bahawa Nizar hanyalah boneka DAP Perak sebagai MB.Dengan keputusan Mahkamah Rayuan membenarkan penagguhan perintah Mahkamah Tinggi semalam, Zambry masih kekal sebagai MB Perak sehingga Mahkamah Rayuan membuat keputusan mengenai rayuannya.

Manakala Nizar, belum boleh bertindak sebagai MB hingga Mahkamah Rayuan membuat keputusan rayuan Zambry. Nizar dan EXCOnya tidak boleh memasuki pejabat MB dan Exco di Bangunan SUK Perak.Keinginan Nizar untuk menghadap Tuanku Sultan Perak memohon pembubaran DUN juga tidak boleh dilakukan.



BN cannot call emergency sitting-NGEH

Aware that Barisan Nasional (BN) could win a no-confidence motion against reinstated mentri besar Datuk Seri Nizar Jamaluddin, Perak DAP chief Datuk Ngeh Koo Ham refuted such a possibility by saying that only the speaker, mentri besar or Sultan could initiate a sitting of the assembly. More...

He added that the May 7 assembly was invalid and as such, the speaker was still V. Sivakumar, who was removed by Barisan Nasional (BN) amid chaotic scenes on that day.
"BN cannot call a sitting," Sivakumar added, although he did not go so far as to say that BN could not table a no-confidence motion against Nizar as this could still happen if the Sultan wished to convene the assembly.
Ngeh, who is also senior state executive councillor, explained that since Zambry's actions as MB in the past three months were now considered invalid, his request for the May 7 assembly was null and void.
"The proclamation of the sitting must also be signed by the MB and Zambry was not the MB," he added.
Earlier, Ngeh had also told reporters that he expected the Court of Appeals to take several days to come to a decision and even then it could still be taken up to the Federal Court.
"Therefore, the court is not the best avenue to resolve this issue as it will only result in protracting the outcome. We still believe that the decision should go back to the people," he said.
When asked if PR might themselves go to the assembly with a confidence motion at this juncture, he replied: "Our emphasis is on the people's rights not our right to stay in power.
"None of us will stay a single day extra without the blessing of the majority of Perak. We prefer to be honourable members of the opposition than to cling on to power."
from malaysian insider

Macam Dua Beradik











Dun Perak Sidang Bawah Pokok

Tak ubah macam dalam cerita P Ramlee, Laksamana DoReMi. Kerajaan buangan Pasir Berdenggung. Firasat P Ramlee memang menjadi. Akhirnya ada yang masih mengaku kerajaan mengadakan Persidangan Dun dibawah pokok.Kali ini bukan pasir saja berdenggung kepala otak depa pun berdenggung.
Itulah masalahnya bila pilih orang tak betul jadi Speaker. Pasal tak dak dah jawatan EXCO nak bagi keling ini, pi bagi jadi Speaker Dewan. Haru biru dewan jadinya. Kalau betul nak buat usul dalam Dewan biarla semua hadir. Yang tegah orang nak masuk dewan pasal apa. Tiga orang dia kata dah letak jawatan. 7 lagi dia gantung. cukup ka korum buat mesyuarat. Kalau betul berani biar semua hadir, kemudian buat usul, tengok yang mana menang belah bahagi.
Kes di mahkamah pula macam mana? Nizar minta mahkamah putuskan siapa MB yang sah. Yang Sultan sahkan dia tak nak pakai. Keputusan mahkamah pun tak ada lagi. baru nak putus bawa ke mahkamah persekutuan. Sivakeling pula kata dia ada kuasa tidak terhad dalam Dewan. Gantung Zambry dan 6 Exco sebab terima tauliah perlantikan Sultan. Ni nak kira macam mana? Katakanlah, kalau hari itu zambri tak terima lantikan Sultan, Sivakeling suka tapi Sultan murka. Bila Zambri dah terima Sivakeling pula yang murka dan katanya Zambri menghina Dewan. Hukumannya gantung dari Dewan. Zambri pun bawa ke mahkamah kes ini. Masih duk tunggu keputusan. 3 orang lagi ADUN pun bawa kes ke mahkamah pasal Sivakeling kata mereka dah tak lagi jadi ADUN. Duk tunggu keputusan juga. Pakat-pakat saman di mahkamah. Awat la yang tak tunggu keputusan mahkamah mengenai kes-kes tersebut?
Hari tu bila 28+3 ADUN menghadap Paduka Tuanku Sultan Perak dan menyatakan sokongan terhadap BN dan hilang sokongan terhadap Nizar, ada pakar-pakar undang-undang kata itu tak boleh pakai. Mesti buat dalam DEWAN( bangunan fizikal). Hari ni macam mana? Di luar Dewan bawah pokok pulak tu, sokong Nizar jadi MB. Boleh pakai ka? Tengok dalam gambar tak nampakpun ada yang pegang kertas mesyuarat. Mesyuarat bawah pokok tak payah kertas mesyuarat kot. pakai main angkat tangan saja. Macam mesyuarat budak tadika. Mesyuarat surau pun ada kertas mesyuarat, inikan pula mesyuarat dewan undangan negeri. Mungkin tak dan nak buat kertas mesyuarat pasal SU Dewan kena buang semalam, baru ganti SU baru. tak sempat nak buat kertas mesyuarat. Minit mesyuarat siapa catit? Kalau bawah pokok boleh pakai petition writer yang biasa buat kerja bawah pokok. Di Ipoh ramai ada. Yang buat usul sokong Nizar jadi MB buat apa lagi sedangkan pada masa yang sama buat usul bubar Dewan. Bubar Dewan jawatan MB pun habis.....oh dia nak jadi MB caretaker government sementara pilihanraya diadakan. Bolehla dok pakai Camry lama sikit. Macam ni punya orang pun ada. sambil-sambil tu dan la gasak apa-apa lebih kurang. Mungkin dia pun tau, kalau pilihanraya semula, dan katakanlah depa menang lagi, dia pun tahu tak tentu lagi boleh jadi MB. tak kelapaq DAP nak ambil dia lagi jadi MB. Itupun kalau boleh menang. Yang dok kalut nak bubar Dewan ni, puak ni confiden sangat ka boleh menang? Apa punya strategi. Sepatutnya tunggu la dulu pilihanraya kecil Bukit Gantang. Tengok orang bukit gantang sokong PAS ke dak. Kalau menang di Bukit Gantang bolehla kata rakyat Perak masih menerima PAS/PR. Lepas tu baru buat manuveur bubar dun utk pilihanraya negeri. Pasal apa yang kalut sangat. Mula-mula nak buat mesyuarat bulan 4, hantar surat mohon perkenan Sultan, tup-tup umum mesyuarat tergempar. Tambi Sivakeling ni main-main dengan Sultan kot. Tak hormat lansung pada Paduka Tuanku Sultan. Mungkin juga depa takut keputusan mahkamah depa kalah atau memang depa dah tahu keputusan mahkamah akan berpihak kepada BN kerana memang dari awal lagi tindakan Sultan menepati peruntukan Perlembagaan. Semua orang yang berfikiran rasional dan tidak berat sebelah tidak meragui tindakan dan keputusan Paduka Tuanku Sultan Perak. Takkan paduka Tuanku akan melakukan sesuatu yang membawa imej buruk terhadap baginda apatah lagi berhubung dengan soal-soal perundangan dimana Paduka Tuanku Sultan sangat mahir dan terkenal. Hanya penyokong PR saja dok kata tindakan Sultan Perak salah pasal tak menguntungkan PR. Kalau tindakan menguntungkan PR, salah pun depa akan kata betul. Cuba kita renung tindakan Sultan Selangor yang menyerahkan isu Elizabeth Wong untuk diselesaikan sendiri oleh TS Khalid. Penyokong PR seronok sangat pasal dalam kepala otak mereka depa kata Sultan tak campur tangan soal politik, depa sokong tindakan Sultan, depa puji Sultan. Tapi, katakanlah Sultan Selangor menitahkan bahawa Baginda tidak mahu ada Anggota Pentadbiran Kerajaan Baginda yang tercemar dengan skandal seks, satu dunia penyokong PR akan belasah Sultan Selangor.Sebenarnya apa yang gagal dilihat oleh penyokong PR ialah, Sultan Selangor sengaja berbuat demikian untuk menyerahkan tanggungjawab tersebut kepada Khalid. Yang bodohnya Khalid. Apa sebenarnya dimaksudkan oleh Sultan Selangor dengan keputusan itu ialah: 1. Perkara kecil macam tu Khalid selesai sendirilah. Takkan Khalid bodoh sangat nak fikir perkara macam tu pun tak boleh sampai nak kena tanya Sultan. Benda sulit dah tunjuk kat orang. Tuan tubuh pun dah bertekad nak lepas jawatan yang dok tahan-tahan tak bagi lepaskan jawatan ni pasal apa? 2. kalau Khalid terima perletakan jawatan Liz Wong dia sendiri kenalah berjawab dengan penyokong PR; kalau dia tak terima perletakan jawatan itu dia kenalah tanggung risiko liabiliti kes tersebut. Lebih kurang bermaksud" lu fikirlah sendiri". Apapun Khalid yang akan kerugian akhirnya....
 
that certain quarters have tended to ridicule judgments of the courts solely for these judgments having ruled one way rather than the other. For them, the expected outcome defines everything.

If it is not disappointing then it is presumed that the process of the law was not compromised. However, if the outcome is disappointing then it is a given that the process was subverted. This cannot be the right way to look at things as, whatever the case, the process of the law is crucial.-Malik Imtiaz Sarwar