Awat La

ABSOLUTE WITH A TWIST

More About Me...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, nisl elit viverra sollicitudin phasellus eros, vitae a mollis. Congue sociis amet, fermentum lacinia sed, orci auctor in vitae amet enim. Ridiculus nullam proin vehicula nulla euismod id. Ac est facilisis eget, ligula lacinia, vitae sed lorem nunc. Orci at nulla risus ullamcorper arcu. Nunc integer ornare massa diam sollicitudin.

Another Tit-Bit...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, nisl elit viverra sollicitudin phasellus eros, vitae a mollis. Congue sociis amet, fermentum lacinia sed, orci auctor in vitae amet enim. Ridiculus nullam proin vehicula nulla euismod id. Ac est facilisis eget, ligula lacinia, vitae sed lorem nunc.

‘We will only act on solid evidence,’ says Anwar



Sunday March 8, 2009 MYT 6:06:00 PM-mSTAR

PENANG: Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said he will act on allegations of corruption involving two state party leaders only if there is solid evidence.
He said the committee concerned would investigate the allegations by Kepala Batas PKR Youth chief Amizudin Ahmat.

"If there is solid evidence, then I would inform Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng to act," he told reporters after jointly lauching the Penang Free WiFi project with Lim, at the Sunway Cannival Mall in Seberang Jaya here on Sunday.
On Thursday, Amizudin had alleged that two state PKR leaders received bribes from a quarry company.- Bernama

Comment:
Solid evidence my foot! He was given the evidence by Amizudin @ Din Binjai early February but failed to act on the matter. The disgusted Amizudin has no choice but to imposed preassure on party suoremos by making public his allegations. He went through proper party channels and yet no actions were taken. Dumb on the part of Amizudin, thinking actions will be taken by Anwar, especially on allegations against his 'golden boy' Fairuz the Dumbo. As for Zahrain, PKR State Liason Chief, arse licker, he is just another dumb LEMBU in Anwar's herd.




 
that certain quarters have tended to ridicule judgments of the courts solely for these judgments having ruled one way rather than the other. For them, the expected outcome defines everything.

If it is not disappointing then it is presumed that the process of the law was not compromised. However, if the outcome is disappointing then it is a given that the process was subverted. This cannot be the right way to look at things as, whatever the case, the process of the law is crucial.-Malik Imtiaz Sarwar