Awat La

ABSOLUTE WITH A TWIST

More About Me...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, nisl elit viverra sollicitudin phasellus eros, vitae a mollis. Congue sociis amet, fermentum lacinia sed, orci auctor in vitae amet enim. Ridiculus nullam proin vehicula nulla euismod id. Ac est facilisis eget, ligula lacinia, vitae sed lorem nunc. Orci at nulla risus ullamcorper arcu. Nunc integer ornare massa diam sollicitudin.

Another Tit-Bit...

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, nisl elit viverra sollicitudin phasellus eros, vitae a mollis. Congue sociis amet, fermentum lacinia sed, orci auctor in vitae amet enim. Ridiculus nullam proin vehicula nulla euismod id. Ac est facilisis eget, ligula lacinia, vitae sed lorem nunc.

Penang PKR Leaders Graft Case

Report on state leaders over illegal activities ready next week
By K. KASTURI DEWI, The STAR
GEORGE TOWN: A state PKR panel investigating two senior state party leaders for allegedly covering up illegal activities by local quarry operators will submit its report next week.
State PKR chairman Datuk Zahrain Mohamed Hashim said the state liaison committee would forward a copy of the report to the party’s central committee for the next course of action, if any was required.
He said the panel, headed by state assembly Speaker Abdul Halim Hussain, had been given three weeks to investigate the allegations by Kepala Batas PKR Youth chief Amizudin Ahmat.
Amizudin, who was then Seberang Prai Municipal councillor, raised the allegations during a full council meeting on Feb 27.
He was the first to be called by the four-member panel set up on March 16.
The other panel members are state assembly Deputy Speaker Tan Hock Leong, Pantai Jerejak assemblyman Sim Tze Tzin and Batu Uban assemblyman S. Raveentharan.
It was also reported that the probe was an internal party matter and had nothing to do with investigations being conducted by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission.
Related article:
Penang PKR to wrap up probe on leaders in four days


 
that certain quarters have tended to ridicule judgments of the courts solely for these judgments having ruled one way rather than the other. For them, the expected outcome defines everything.

If it is not disappointing then it is presumed that the process of the law was not compromised. However, if the outcome is disappointing then it is a given that the process was subverted. This cannot be the right way to look at things as, whatever the case, the process of the law is crucial.-Malik Imtiaz Sarwar